TL;DR
Get health and wellness essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Sixty and Me published a personal essay urging readers to reconsider six expressions: “I’ll try,” “can’t,” “always,” “never,” “if only” and “but.” The author says these words can encourage avoidance, rigid thinking or defensiveness, but the piece presents personal reflections, not research showing that the phrases cause those effects.
Sixty and Me published a personal advice essay urging readers to rethink six familiar words and phrases—“I’ll try,” “can’t,” “always,” “never,” “if only” and “but”—that its author says can reinforce unhelpful habits or complicate relationships. The piece offers examples and alternative wording, but it is an opinion-based reflection rather than a reported study or formal language guidance.
The author frames the argument around how habitual language can shape self-talk and interactions with other people. The essay distinguishes the six expressions from swear words, which the author says they avoid in everyday speech, and focuses instead on phrases they believe can weaken commitment, obscure choice or make communication less constructive.
For “I’ll try,” the author describes encouraging an adult son, Joel, to use more definite language while discussing everyday health habits. The essay says Joel lost 35 pounds over six months after taking regular walks and changing what was available at home during the pandemic. That account is the author’s personal report; the article does not establish that changing the phrase itself caused the weight loss.
The author says “can’t” can conceal choices, and suggests describing what did or did not happen more precisely. “Always” and “never,” the essay argues, can turn specific frustrations into sweeping judgments in relationships or self-talk. It recommends replacing “if only” with language focused on the circumstances at hand, and changing “but” to “and” in some sentences to avoid seeming to cancel out what came before.
How Everyday Phrases Shape Conversations
The advice is relevant because the phrases discussed are common in family, work and personal conversations. A broad accusation such as “you always” can make a disagreement feel like a judgment of someone’s character rather than a discussion of a particular event. Likewise, an apology followed by “but” may sound to the listener like an excuse, even when the speaker intends to explain what happened.
The essay’s practical contribution is to invite readers to notice wording and test alternatives. Saying “I didn’t take a walk today” instead of “I can’t take a walk” can make a statement more specific; replacing “but” with “and” may help preserve two ideas in one sentence. These are suggestions for reflection, not rules that apply in every situation. The right wording depends on what is true, what the speaker means and how the other person is likely to hear it.
Readers should also distinguish a language habit from a personal limitation. Not every use of “can’t” is an excuse: people can face genuine barriers, including health, access, time or obligations. The essay’s examples are best read as prompts to examine individual circumstances, rather than as evidence that a particular phrase predicts success or failure.
Products Worth Considering
Garmin Venu® 3 Premium Fitness Smartwatch 45mm Black
Fitbit Sense 2 Smartwatch – Blue Mist / Pale Gold
Levoit Core 400S-P Smart Air Purifier for Large Rooms
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The essay opens with a story about a friend whose fiancé, described as multilingual, removed the word “divorce” from his dictionaries as a gesture of reassurance. The author says the couple remained married more than 40 years later. The anecdote introduces the essay’s central idea that words can carry emotional meaning, but it does not establish a general effect of avoiding a word.
The author also recounts partnering with a colleague for regular calls over seven years while both practiced replacing what they called “limiting beliefs” with affirmations. The author says they saw progress in their personal and professional lives. The source does not provide independent evidence or details that would allow readers to assess those outcomes beyond the author’s account.
The six expressions are presented as a personal list, not as a universally recognized set of harmful words. The article’s examples range from the author’s family conversations to self-talk about exercise and time management. It closes by encouraging readers to identify habitual wording and consider alternatives that better match what they mean.
What the Essay Does Not Establish
The source is a personal advice essay, and it does not cite research showing that avoiding these six expressions improves health, relationships or personal outcomes. Its claims about how listeners interpret a phrase are the author’s views and examples, not findings attributed to researchers or communication specialists.
The source material does not provide a publication date, so the timing of the essay cannot be stated more precisely. It also does not include a response from a language or mental-health expert. Whether a phrase is helpful or harmful can depend on the situation, tone and meaning; the essay does not set out a test for judging those differences.
A Reader’s Language Check
The essay’s proposed next step is personal reflection: notice which expressions recur in everyday speech or private self-talk, then try alternatives that are more precise and fit the facts. For example, a reader might replace “I always get this wrong” with a description of the particular mistake, or replace “if only” with a statement about what can be done under current circumstances.
No formal follow-up, study or expert review is identified in the source material. The practical question for readers is whether the suggested substitutions make their own communication clearer and more accurate—not whether every listed word must be avoided.
Key Questions
Which six words or phrases does the essay recommend reconsidering?
It lists “I’ll try,” “can’t,” “always,” “never,” “if only” and “but.” The author argues that they can sometimes support avoidance, sweeping judgments, regret or defensiveness.
Does the essay say these phrases are always harmful?
No. It presents the list as the author’s personal advice and examples, not as a universal rule. A word’s effect depends on the situation and what the speaker means.
Is the advice backed by a study?
The supplied source material does not cite a study validating the six-word list or showing that avoiding the phrases produces specific outcomes. The claims are presented through personal stories and opinion.
What alternatives does the author suggest?
The essay recommends being more specific, such as saying what did not happen instead of saying “I can’t.” It also suggests replacing “if only” with “since this is here, I have a new opportunity,” and using “and” rather than “but” in some sentences.
Source: sixtyandme.com
