TL;DR
After two recent deadly and serious grizzly attacks in national parks, Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke has proposed removing federal protections for grizzly bears. Conservationists criticize the move as premature and misleading, emphasizing that attacks are rare and management decisions require scientific review.
Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke has called for the removal of federal protections for grizzly bears following two recent attacks in national parks, which resulted in one death and two injuries. This political move comes amid ongoing debate over bear management and conservation, with critics warning that the attacks highlight the need for continued protections rather than delisting.
On May 3, a 33-year-old hiker was killed by a grizzly bear in Glacier National Park, marking the first fatal attack there since 1998. The next day, in Yellowstone National Park, two brothers, aged 14 and 28, were seriously injured in a grizzly attack near Old Faithful. In response, Zinke posted on social media on May 12, advocating for the federal government to delist grizzly bears from the Endangered Species Act (ESA), arguing their populations have recovered sufficiently.
Conservation experts, including Chris Servheen, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) grizzly recovery coordinator, criticized Zinke’s proposal. Servheen stated that the attacks were chance events unrelated to the species’ protected status and emphasized that both incidents occurred on federal land where state management authority is limited, regardless of ESA protections. The FWS’s scientific review, which is required to delist a species, has not indicated that grizzly populations no longer need protection. Congress, however, could bypass this process through legislation.
Why It Matters
This development is significant because it signals potential policy shifts in how grizzly bears are managed and protected in the U.S. If protections are removed prematurely, it could affect conservation efforts and human-wildlife interactions. Critics warn that such a move could undermine scientific assessments and risk increased conflicts, while supporters argue it would allow states more control over bear management.
SABRE Frontiersman MAX Bear Spray & Mountain Lion Deterrent – 40‑Foot Range, Max Strength 2% Major Capsaicinoids, EPA‑Registered, Self Defense for Hiking, Camping, Hunting, Fishing & Biking, 7.9 oz
EPA-REGISTERED BEAR & MOUNTAIN LION SPRAY: Approved to deter bears and mountain lions; maximum strength 2.0% Major Capsaicinoids,…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
Grizzly bears have been listed under the ESA since 1975, with populations recovering from about 700 to nearly 2,000 in the contiguous U.S. today. Management of these bears has historically involved federal oversight, especially in national parks. Recent attacks have reignited debates over whether the species is sufficiently recovered and whether protections should be lifted, despite ongoing scientific assessments indicating the need for continued conservation measures.
“These interactions are chance events that would occur whether the grizzly was managed by state authorities or not.”
— Chris Servheen, former FWS grizzly bear recovery coordinator
“Saying delisting is necessary because there have been two attacks recently is extremely misleading and ignores basic science.”
— Andrea Zaccardi, legal director, Center for Biological Diversity
SABRE Frontiersman MAX Bear Spray & Mountain Lion Deterrent – 40‑Foot Range, Max Strength 2% Major Capsaicinoids, EPA‑Registered, Self Defense for Hiking, Camping, Hunting, Fishing & Biking, 7.9 oz
EPA-REGISTERED BEAR & MOUNTAIN LION SPRAY: Approved to deter bears and mountain lions; maximum strength 2.0% Major Capsaicinoids,…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Remains Unclear
It remains unclear whether the FWS will move forward with a scientific review to delist the species or if Congress will legislate protections away. The political and legal processes involved are complex and still unfolding, and the impact of recent attacks on policy decisions is uncertain.
NedFoss 120dB Bear Bell with Electronic Air Horn, Hiking Essentials for Women, Pro Bear Safety Kit for Hiking Gear Gifts, Dual Deterrent for Hiking, Camping, Biking, Fishing
【Dual Bear Deterrent System: 120dB Air Horn + 100-Yard Alert Bell】Combine proactive bear bell jingles (audible 100+ yards)…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What’s Next
The FWS is expected to conduct or update its scientific review of the grizzly bear population before any delisting decision. Legislative actions by Congress could also influence the outcome. Monitoring developments in federal and legislative responses over the coming months will be critical.
BearVault BV475 Trek Portable Bear Resistant Canister – Large
New MidSize Option, BV475 Trek! Shorter than the BV500 bear can for long distance backpackers, yet light and…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Could the grizzly bear be delisted soon?
It is not yet clear. The FWS must conduct a scientific review to determine if the population has recovered sufficiently, and legislative actions could also influence the process.
Are grizzly attacks common?
No. Attacks are extremely rare, and recent research indicates that the risk of attack remains low compared to other risks like driving.
What measures can visitors take to stay safe in bear country?
Experts recommend traveling in groups of four or more, making noise on the trail, and carrying bear spray to reduce the risk of attack.
Why do some believe delisting is premature?
Conservationists cite ongoing scientific assessments that support continued protections and warn that recent attacks do not justify removing ESA protections at this time.
